CWT Fragile entry

Post your images here for a (perhaps frank!) appraisal by other club members

CWT Fragile entry

Postby peterr » Fri Sep 04, 2020 3:18 pm

My monochrome picture of a damselfly for the CWT Fragile competition caused a lot of debate at the review meeting.Why convert it to B&W? What did the colour version look like? were among the comments from the meeting participants. Well here is the colour version together with the B&W version as entered. My reasons for converting to monochrome were to de-emphasise the distracting background and draw out the fine detail in the damselfly's wings. So the question is, did I make the right decision?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
peterr
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 1:21 pm

Re: CWT Fragile entry

Postby TonyMac » Fri Sep 04, 2020 3:32 pm

I think the case for the mono conversion is proved with out a shadow of a doubt Peter.
The Damselfly stands out so much more.
Its a shame that the background is so distracting because there are some beautiful colours also
TonyMac
Summer programme secretary
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:03 am

Re: CWT Fragile entry

Postby BillCr » Fri Sep 04, 2020 4:04 pm

I agree with Tony. The wings too look much more delicate/fragile. I do like mono anyway.
User avatar
BillCr
 
Posts: 575
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:05 am
Location: Mathon

Re: CWT Fragile entry

Postby kimw » Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:32 am

Hmmm,
To me pulling out the detail has done the opposite of fragile. It`s hardened up the wings etc taking out the softness of the critter.
Colour for me with a toned down background---to much green with little interest.
User avatar
kimw
Programme Secretary
 
Posts: 1981
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:47 pm
Location: Malvern,Worcestershire


Return to Critique thread

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests